NEWS ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 16, 2004.

 

 

THE TIGER FORCE CASE

 

EEEEE

 

Last October The Blade, a newspaper of Toledo, Oregon, USA, made a surprise around the world by reporting the newly disclosed stories of the massacre committed by the American soldiers in the Vietnam War. The series carries the title "Buried Secrets, Brutal Truths."

 

The accounts could be found on The Toledo Blade web site www.toledoblade.com. They consisted of information gathered from recently declassified documents of the U.S. Army and interviews with a number of officers, NCOs and Enlisted men of the 101st Airborne Division.

 

According to articles on The Blade, the soldiers were members of the platoon-size task force known as the Tiger Force. They are believed to have committed illegal execution of many dozen – even more than a hundred - innocent civilians who showed no sign of being disguised enemies or acted against the soldiers. Most victims were old people, women and children. The atrocities included cutting ears and scalping for souvenirs.

 

The massacres, according to the articles, took place in the “highlands of Quang Ngai and Quang Nam,” mostly in Song Ve valley, Duc Pho district, and Quang Ngai province during 7 months the Tiger were operating in the area, from April to November 1967. The Blade’s articles disclosed that the Army launched an investigation from May to November 1967 that identified 18 suspects among Tiger Force members, but none of them was arraigned or punished. Recently, the Department of Defense said that the case might be reopened for more investigation although the official investigation has closed for almost 36 years.

 

Every Vietnamese is shocked by the stories. As many other Asians, they are very sensitive at any bloodshed committed by foreign soldiers against their compatriots. Whether the killers are Vietnamese or foreigners, they must be punished. However, to those who have profound knowledge about Hanoi communist regime and the way Western reporters seeing the Vietnam War, the Blade’s accounts lead to many questions.

 

There were undeniable war crimes in the said areas. However, the number of victims has not been approximately determined. Witnesses and suspects each gave far different numbers.

 

The communist regime has always grasped events of the kind – American and South Vietnamese military soldiers’ wrongdoing – to launch propaganda campaigns. A killing of five or ten victims could have been made into a massacre five hundred or one thousand by Communist propaganda.

 

Why this time Hanoi has been silent at such atrocities for so long, not until the Toledo Blade broke the news did Communist authorities voice their comments? Was the number of victims really high? Did Hanoi leaders know the massacre? Or they knew it but purposely kept silent?

 

Many analysts who are familiar with Vietnam Communist affairs are saying that Hanoi leaders were certainly well informed of the event. But they decided it was a killing of a small number, not sensational enough to make a great noise. During the war, anything of some importance for propaganda was quickly exploited, carefully recorded, maintained with full details, usually exaggerated, for psyops purposes. It is hardly possible that Hanoi leaders could have neglected the case if the reported stories are true.

 

The localities where the massacres reportedly took place were under tight control of the Hanoi government. Communist intelligence and counter-intelligence cells would let no event of the lowest importance escape their attention. In the last 28 years, Communist leaders at all levels must have full records of the Tiger Force massacre and a full list of the victims, true and imaginary victims if the crimes did happen.

 

The Blade reporters took the My Lai massacre as an example. The killing done by Lt. Calley’s platoon of the Americal Division took the lives of 300 to 500 peasants, unarmed and having no acts against the soldiers. It’s nothing wrong to recall the gristly events at My Lai to show readers a clear sight into hidden corners of the war.

 

But why did the Blade writers fail to mention the much more gristly massacres conducted by Vietnam Communist soldiers in the Tet 1968 Offensive around Hue City? The cleansing campaign took the lives of many local citizens, unarmed soldiers on vacation visiting their relatives and unarmed civil servants and notables, priests, monks and even German professors.

 

A number of victims were buried alive on the Communists’ route of retreat. In months of searching, only corpses of about 5,000 captives among the 10.000 listed as missing were discovered in mass graves around Hue City.

 

If the slaughters by American and South Vietnamese were taken into discussion, an honest writer or speaker or journalist must not forget to bring about the assassinations and mass murders committed by the Communist death squads during the wars. Their victims amounted to more than 50,000 in less than 20 years, in the war 1959-1975. Many of them were members of unarmed village and hamlet elected officials, not including more than 250,000 RVN soldiers killed in action.

 

In a wider view, there were killing of a hundred or more Vietnamese peasants by the South Korean troops fighting in South Vietnam. That incident must have been included in any paper about war crimes in the Vietnam War.

 

Deliberate failure to take into consideration of such crimes of the Communist side might be called one-sidedness and selfishness. Many correspondents might be afraid of facing troubles by Hanoi communist authorities if they publish anything that may anger the party leaders, whose immediate reaction could be visa cancellation.

 

Moreover, how did the investigators from the Toledo Blade select people to be interviewed? The selection and the interview were done with or without control or presence of local Public Security officers?  How they could be sure that the interviewees were saying the truth and not what Communist cadres in charge of local Public Security agency had ordered them to say?

 

According to the reports, a Communist colonel from the Quang Nam province government told reporters that he would conduct an investigation to learn more details about the killing. In his own words he admitted, "We want to know more about this platoon, and what they did. Why did they operate this way? We have never heard of this before." Loud and clear.

 

A Communist colonel who has never heard of such important event in his own province! That is worth re-consideration of the allegation. In this rural area, every villager knows the others and any pet dog of the neighbors. They must have known the true stories if such killing actually occurred.

 

In a color picture printed in one of the reports, readers can see something not usual. The caption says it’s a marker of the place where civilians were murdered.

 

As it appears in the picture, the marker has the size of about 3.2x2 feet (110x60 cm), with thickness about 2 inc. (5 cm).  Looking closely in the picture, people could see the uneven, softly undulated surface of the board without the sharpness of hard wood or stone at the edges. The marker must be a wooden board covered by white paper or white cloth on which were inscriptions in bright red characters.

 

The whole thing proves itself a cheap propaganda trick. The marker looks like a small signboard that was probably made in haste to serve a five-minute purpose: Taking a picture to print beside an article.

 

In an article of the series, The Blade reports, "a Vietnamese official said yesterday the country wants to put the conflict behind it even though it caused much suffering.

 

But in another article, the Communist colonel was quoted as saying, "This is not something we should forget."

 

Actually, the Communist regime has never acted accordingly. Despite while it is urging people to put the past behind and forget old hatred, the Party continues stuffing young kids' heads with animosity and exercising the policy of discrimination against the former members of the defeated nationalist government and their descendants.

 

The true war crimes should be told and recorded for history. with impartial and accurate evidence, without providing Hanoi munitions for slanderous propaganda.

***

 

================